As we discussed in the
last class, it’s not as easy as saying that Elinor is sense Marianne is
sensibility. They both show contrasting sides at different times. In Volume II
and III, they definitely show some shift, but I wonder what Austen is trying to
say about that change in behavior. Marianne has to marry her second choice and
live in her sister’s back yard for the rest of her life. At first I’m left
thinking, I’m left thinking “so sense is not the fun place to be.” But then
Elinor is also kind of the leftovers for Edward and I don’t want to be either
of them. This, in that way, may be the most realistic of emotions from an
Austen novel? It may seem the most cookie cutter happy ending, but at the same
time, both women took the best option given their circumstance. They made the
best of what they had. This may be to say that yes, Austen’s novels are often
not exactly reality, but they can teach women that they can still be happy by
making the most of what is available to them. Maybe? Is that too much of a
stretch? Her commentary also seems to go further that the only real companions
that you’ll ever have, the ones that you want that want you, are your siblings.
Austen herself was very close to her sister and neither of them married, so
they spent a lot of time together and greatly valued their relationship. In the
end of this novel, Elinor and Marianne end up living together. So does sisters
still together and living together equal the happy ending?
Because I wouldn’t be happy to be either of these characters really just in
their love life.
The ending is reflective of Austen's philosophy of love- passion versus intellect. It suggests that when women "make the best of what they had" they are using their intellect to look beyond the short-term ambitions of their passions and instead focus on the long-term consequences of that passion.
ReplyDelete