Tuesday, February 28, 2012
In Defense of the Novel
I agree with Catherine’s thought that it is
difficult to determine when the narrator in Northanger
Abbey is speaking, and when Austen is asserting her own opinions through
her text. However, one point where I really see Austen herself coming through is
in chapter five, when she discusses the generally negative opinion people held
of the novel at that time. Catherine and Isabella read novels together – “Yes,
novels” (58) (can you believe it?!), and the narrator rebukes other authors of
the time for “degrading by their contemptuous censure the very performances, to
the number of which they are themselves adding” (58). This comment is clearly
deeply personal to Austen: her snarky tone suggests that she has some level of
investment in the idea, and also, she writes
novels – like this one! I don’t see any way we could separate Austen from
her narrator here. That sentiment is reinforced on the next page, where Austen writes
that, “there seems almost a general with of decrying the capacity and
undervaluing the labour of the novelist, and of slighting the performances
which have only genius, wit, and taste to recommend them” (59). This comment is
even more immediately personal for Austen, as it concerns not only the novel as
a product, but the novelist as a person. Many of the other criticisms in the
novel (those about Isabella’s behavior and the value of friendship, for
example) could be more ambiguous in terms of whether or not they are Austen’s
direct opinions. However, it seems that these thoughts on the practice of
writing novels must necessarily be the author’s own. Acknowledging this
complicates the rest of the novel: if Austen is asserting her actual philosophy
here, isn’t it likely that she’s using her own voice (as opposed to the narrator’s)
elsewhere, too? Perhaps. Either way I generally agree with her, but especially with
her declaration that the novel is “only some work in which the greatest powers of
the mind are displayed, in which the most thorough knowledge of human nature, the
happiest delineation of its varieties, the liveliest effusions of wit and humour,
are conveyed to the world in the best chosen language” (60). Well said, Miss Austen.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
In looking at the passages mentioned above, I agree that Austen expresses her own opinion of novels. As we discussed in class, novels were not a highly regarded form of literature in the 18th century. I think it's safe to say that Austen, a novelist, uses the narrator's voice to defend her occupation and her work. At the same time, however, Austen ridicules parts of the Gothic novel, which can be confusing for the reader. These passages make it clear that while Austen might not be a fan of Gothic novels, she is in support of the form on the whole.
ReplyDelete